TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
From: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Reply-to: Steve Baron - KB3MM <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 14:28:10 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 17:25
Subject: [TenTec] Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>


> Hi,
>
> Am curious.   John, N1JM, indicates that the Jim's (K5HO) OMNI V, Serial
> # 94A10059, appears to have been manufactured in April 1989.
>
> Is there an accurate means of determining when a T-T rig has been made?

Yes, call TT.

>
> I have a PARAGON II that has Serial # 05A10104.   These came off the
> assembly line before the OMNI V's.  According to the way you suggested,
> John, it would have come off the line in 1994.  This seems reasonable.  I
> rather believe 1994 as the correct year.  It came out a few years after
> the original Paragon was produced.
>
> I also have an OMNI 6 Plus, Serial # 10A10559.  Does this mean it was made
> in 1989?  I doubt it.  Probably 1999. This design followed the OMNI 6
which
> was produced after the OMNI 5.
>
> Anyone have any input to aid setting all this straight?  As I mentioned, I
am
> curious how the serial number codes apply to these rigs.
>
> 73 to all -  Don,  ve1bn@ns.sympatico.ca
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>