TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] real CW ops

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] real CW ops
From: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:05:01 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I like that definition.  K3TX

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of w8au@sssnet.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 10:48 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] real CW ops

At 02:19 AM 4/9/05, Steve N4LQ wrote:
>What I can't stand is these guys using keyboards at 30 wpm and sending
>PERIODS at the end of each sentence. Man that sounds liddy.

That's the difference between a "typist" and a "real CW opr."  :-)

(I know a few keyboard users that AVOID the punctuation and full
spelling
of every word, and just type the standard brasspounder abbreviations)

Perry    w8au 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>