To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Older TT rigs & SCAF-1 (was "Looking for Omni-546C") |
From: | "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Fri, 17 Dec 2004 08:26:14 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I agree. The MFJ is hard to beat. I haven't tried that SCAF filter but since
it's only a "low pass" filter you will still hear the thumps and rumble of
the LF noise. Steve N4LQ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Guenther" <ni0c@earthlink.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:59 AM Subject: [TenTec] Older TT rigs & SCAF-1 (was "Looking for Omni-546C") For a great all-purpose audio filter, the MFJ-784B tunable DSP filter is hard to beat. This one can be tuned for very narrow (down to 30 Hz) bandwidths, which can be centered around your favorite CW offset (pitch) frequency. It has ten memories. I have five each CW filter bandwidths saved for 550 and 600 Hz offsets, respectively. I use it with my Omni VI/Opt. 1. It can also be used for SSB and data signals, and it has a variable noise reduction feature as well. Since the filters are FIR (finite impulse response) there is no phase distortion. The drawback is that it costs more than the SCAF filter. It's worth considering. 73 de Chuck NI0C
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Older TT rigs & SCAF-1 (was "Looking for Omni-546C"), Chuck Guenther |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Orion] Re: Orion - Work in Progress, N0KHQ |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Older TT rigs & SCAF-1 (was "Looking for Omni-546C"), Chuck Guenther |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Older TT rigs & SCAF-1 (was "Looking for Omni-546C"), Joe Giacobello |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |