TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion
From: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 07:34:52 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Anyone know if the League has documented and disclosed its step-by-step
Product Review testing methods and procedures?  Specifically, is each
measuring instrument calibrated against a traceable standard before each
product evaluation?

And, what assurance and validation process takes place to ensure that their
results are accurate?  At a minimum, I would hope that their test results
are repeated, and conducted by alternate personnel to validate the
procedure, notwithstanding test equipment measuring error.

-Paul, W9AC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <K8bvj@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion


> In a message dated 12/13/2003 7:08:16 AM Eastern Standard Time,
s56a@bit.si
> writes:
>
> >
> > W4ZV>
> > Radio   BDR at 20kHz     BDR at 5kHz     BDR at 1kHz
> > K2          136        126        TBD
> > Orion         129        130        TBD
> > FT-1000MP     142        119        TBD
> >
> > We often check $$$ numbers for price/performance ratio in poorer
countries!
> >
> > It was mentioned here only in IC-7800 case
>
> It's amazing how you fellas compare the Orion or even the Jupiter to a K2
rig
> or even some of those Jap rigs.
>
> Enjoy your American made rig and the super tech support from Ten Tec.
> Forget the numbers, it's the real world experience that counts.
>
> Jack
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>