TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] field day from hell

To: geraldj@isunet.net, tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] field day from hell
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:46:17 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Jerry,

I use CT by K1EA Contest Logging Program when I operate in contests. I do not have to keep a paper log and a paper dupe sheet, and when the contest is over the score calculation and prepartation of the log for submission is much less work. I still have to copy the CW callsigns and other contest exchange information. Sending is mostly done using the 'F' keys on the computor with occasional fills and repeats from the keyer paddle. This is nearly the same as if I were using a memory keyer. The only significant difference is that when I have the other station's callsign typed into the computor I can sent that with a push of the "F4" key. There is still quite a bit of operator skill necessary to make the QSOs, and what is more important it is still a lot of fun, without the drugery of the paper log preparation after the contest.

As for having the computer do the CW copying, I have not seen a copying machine or program that could come close to the capability of a human processor for sorting out and copying a signal in a crowded contest pileup. Maybe someday the technology will evolve to that point (maybe it already has, and I'm just not aware of it). I agree that that would take the fun out of it. But then just because the technology exists, does not mean we have to use it. We could still do it the way that is most fun for us. For me using a computer to log does not detract form my enjoyment of CW contesting, in fact I believe that it enhances my enjoyment. I do not think that it detracts from the enjoyment of other operators who may choose to use a paper log, as it sounds virtually the same on the air. Maybe fewer mistakes and less sloppy sending. Is it an unfair advantage towards a high score? I don't know. Maybe there should be a separate catagory for paper loggers. The final score is not so important to me as the enjoyment of operating.

Ken N6KB

Johnson, electrical engineer wrote:

At that point, why not have the computer copy, then the operator can
take a long siesta and wander back to see how the contest went. Where's
the OPERATOR SKILL in that? Like a local no code Extra who claims 100
countries on CW but can't copy CW in the real world. Just spent the
right money on computer software and computer controlled radios.

The local logging software produced by ISU students hasn't been nearly
so sophisticated and often takes more time to log than to make the
contact, sometimes two or three times longer to log than to make
contests. I ran much better scores on paper logs in the past. Besides I
don't copy to keyboard nearly as fast or accurately as to paper.

73, Jerry, K0CQ




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>