To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ? |
From: | DennisKT5D@aol.com (DennisKT5D@aol.com) |
Date: | Wed Mar 5 08:21:26 2003 |
As a "working engineer" who has also been an amateur operator for 35 years, I totally agree with this (Tom's) observation of the issue of ARRL testing as it relates to industry standards and practices. I also agree that if the ARRL wants more credibility for their tests they need to invest in better equipment and thereby establish a firmer basis for their results. I fear that what they publish as fact is all too often taken as gospel truth among many hams, in more areas than equipment testing. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] SALE: 216, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays, DennisKT5D@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ?, Stuart Rohre |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Spare Tuning Knobs, Mark Erbaugh |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |