The desire to display may be the deciding factor at TT though....
Really rough when the dispplayed frequency really isn't a full measurement.
----- Original Message -----
From: <JimN0OCT@aol.com>
To: <SteveBaron@starlinx.com>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: October 20, 1999 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Replies for Omni VI+ Service
Hmmm, I don't have a separate VFO for the TR7, so I wouldn't know. Besides,
the rig only runs semi-QSK. I would guess that you would just have to
concentrate on something other than the display whilst sending. ;-)
73, Jim
NØOCT
In a message dated 20-Oct-99 16:00:58 Central Daylight Time,
SteveBaron@starlinx.com writes:
>
> Is't there a problem though ?
>
> Working split and keying at a decent speed would require the counter to
make
> a measurement prett fast - or maybe simply not measure while sending.
>
> Lets see - if I was on the XMIT frequency for 0.1 seconds, what kind of
> frequency read out resolution would I have ?
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|