Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?

[Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>]

This is a great point.  It's relative.  But the world is not swimming in 
VE9 prefix so you already have a pretty nice call as it sits now.  If 
you had a K6 or W3, then I would guess the impact would be more significant.
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

On 3/10/2024 3:35 PM, Mike Ritz wrote:
> As WPX tends to be a run-fest, I’ve found that using unique prefixes can provide one somewhat 
> longer runs, especially for smaller stations. We deliberately tried to get a good 
> “WPX” callsign for our small contest club (WM7A). My W7 callsign is just another 
> common callsign.
>
> 73;
> Mike
> W7VO
> Sent from my iPhone, utilizing  a very tiny keyboard fed from very fat fingers
>
> > On Mar 10, 2024, at 1:00 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/10/2024 11:13 AM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote:
> > > What are people thoughts on using a totally unique prefix in the 2 x CQWPX
> > > contests?
> > It makes things more interesting during the final hours. I use our small  
> > club's call, KU6W.
> >
> > 73, Jim K9YC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest