CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"
From: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:51:18 -0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
2BSIQ is not dueling CQs.
You can eventually user that feature if one of the pileups dries up,
ideally, you would have two constant streams of calling stations on two
separate bands, without the need to call CQ.

73,

Martín, LU5DX

El vie., 19 mar. 2021 9:22 a. m., rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com>
escribió:

> Calling it “dueling CQs” like N1MM does it makes it instantly
> understandable.
>
> Ria
> N2RJ
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:09 PM Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <
> cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> > In Jim’s defense... I can believe him.  I didn’t know what the acronym
> > stood for, either.
> >
> > And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.
> >
> > 73, ron w3wn
> >
> > > On Mar 18, 2021, at 6:07 PM, OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk> wrote:
> > >
> > > @K9YC Jim
> > > And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would
> you
> > > just point something out !
> > >
> > > Categories and Assisted and SO2R and . . . .
> > > Isn't it all about the way results are presented to the public ?
> > > Why is it so hard to make OVERLAYs and put the results on-line?
> > > I think it is all about sorting the final results.
> > >
> > > Take a look of the listings in the SAC Booklet 2020 -
> > >
> https://www.sactest.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Booklet-2020.pdf
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------
> > > * Vy 73 de OZ2I  Henning *
> > > -----------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > Den tor. 18. mar. 2021 kl. 17.11 skrev Jim Brown <
> > k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com
> > >> :
> > >
> > >>> On 3/17/2021 2:06 PM, ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest wrote:
> > >>> It seems the top scores in CW contesting from now on will be
> dominated
> > >> by those ops capable of 2BSIQ.
> > >>
> > >> What is 2BSIQ?
> > >>
> > >> 73, Jim K9YC
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> > >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>