CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending 'test'

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending 'test'
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:33:57 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 28/11/2018 08:29, Chris Tran GM3WOJ wrote:

I would just send (once) ‘CQ GM2V’, listen for about 3s, then ‘CQ GM2V’ again.  I’ve 
calculated that this ‘CQ GM2V’ takes about 2.5s to send at 40wpm, so no-one has to wait longer than 6s to hear 
both the next CQ and the callsign.


Sending "CQ" takes 27 dot units, whereas "TEST" takes 21 dot units.
Doesn't that mean "GM2V TEST" is more efficient than "CQ GM2V"? :-)

73,
Paul EI5DI

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>