IMO, it would have been far better for him to S&P than to tie up the
part of the band that those with smaller stations or those on the west
coast can use to call CQ.
As to Ranko's comments supporting interleaved CQs -- he's thinking only
for the big guns, letting the smaller stations only S&P. I don't
consider that a reasonable position. Indeed, I firmly support Frank,
W3LPL, the owner of another superstation. This is the same respect and
consideration for others that causes GOOD hams to choose radios that
occupy the minimum bandwidth and always tweak their stations to be as
clean as possible.
73, Jim K9YC
On Thu,3/16/2017 12:34 PM, garyk9gs wrote:
In this case, split was a great idea. He was high in the band and the
impact on others was minimal. Much better to work split than to have
him go QRT in frustration.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|