To: | "reflector cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP |
From: | "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Dave Hachadorian <k6ll.dave@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:39:51 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I think an assisted category should be added to the NAQP. Whenever I'm doing a manual S&P on CW or RTTY, I keep thinking of how inefficient the process is, compared to skimmers publicly broadcasting the information. I think using all available technology in interesting and fun, and represents progress. Adding assisted categories is a strong trend in contesting, and I think the NAQP should be included. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd rule in NAQP, Fco. Luis Delgadillo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, Gerry Hull |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, Jeff Clarke |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW Pictures Wanted!, Chris Hurlbut |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |