CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP

To: "reflector cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP
From: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:39:51 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think an assisted category should be added to the NAQP.

Whenever I'm doing a manual S&P on CW or RTTY, I keep thinking of
how inefficient the process is, compared to skimmers publicly
broadcasting the information.

I think using all available technology in interesting and fun,
and represents progress.  Adding assisted categories is a strong
trend in contesting, and I think the NAQP should be included.

Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
Yuma, AZ


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>