I'm amazed for the "witch hunt" mode for a simple opinion of a well respected
fellow contester.
Is this the way to attract new blood?
Back to my flames shield.
Enviado desde mi Huawei de Telcel
-------- Mensaje original --------
Asunto: [CQ-Contest] Absurd rule in NAQP
De: kr2q@optimum.net
Para: cq-contest@contesting.com
CC:
Pete,
First, let me congratulate you for continuing to spit into wind for so many
go-arounds.
I admire your stick-to-it-ness.
Second, it is no mystery (at least to me) why you are getting so much
opposition.
Go to Randy's blog on CQWW.com and read the recent surveys (two from December
blogs).
http://cqww.com/blog/
For whatever reason (many of them covered in the recent posts), North Americans
really don't
like the use of spotting assistance, whether cluster or RBN (never mind the
"hidden" phone calls,
text messages, Skype, etc. Of course, the latter set is "private" so no real
pileup generation).
Also shown in Randy's BLOGs (same two in Dec) is a breakdown by age. So a lot
of "us"
North Americans are, well, pretty old and (hence?) pretty set in our ways.
Sure, most of "us"
still enjoy new technology and are even eager to try it out. But that does not
means that
when it comes to utilization during our favorite contest(s) that we are willing
to change.
There is great comfort is falling back into "the old ways," the old (as it was
already stated here)
"A boy and his radio." It is kinda cool, too, although I am sure NONE of use
would want to keep
a log on paper any longer.
I have not used RBN or cluster or any spotting assistance while contesting for
lots of years...how
many? Well, I have NEVER used it during any single op contest. So that is many
decades.
Disclaimer
Back in the mid 1980's, at a M/M, we did delight in having stacked 2m boomers
focused on the
FRC guys. It was a friendly competition and we mostly did it to let them know
"we here you
in NY" but we also called out more stuff than we got. It was just friendly
competition.
So in closing, thanks for your hard work in helping to set up all of this very
neat technology.
And I guess this supports the hypothesis that no good deed goes unpunished.
de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|