CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP
From: AE1P <ae1p@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:32:56 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree with Jim on this one...

Take away the 100 w and no spotting...
and its the same as most other contests...
NAQP has always been my favorite, if only because
I will never have anything more than a little pistol station...
If its not broken why try fixing it?

73
Neil
AE1P

On 1/17/2016 1:29 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Sat,1/16/2016 1:24 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
It's hard for me to understand why NAQP would cling to this antiquated situation.

Because NAQP is basically designed for a boy and his 100W radio. No amp, no assistance. Use of spots changes the nature of the contest. One of the most fun aspects of these contests is team competition, and Multi-ops are not eligible. Certainly there's benefit in Multi-single for training, but I really see NAQP as a SO LP unassisted contest.

73, Jim K9YC




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


--
73,
Neil,
AE1P

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>