To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:29:18 -0800 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Sat,1/16/2016 1:24 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: It's hard for me to understand why NAQP would cling to this antiquated situation. Because NAQP is basically designed for a boy and his 100W radio. No amp, no assistance. Use of spots changes the nature of the contest. One of the most fun aspects of these contests is team competition, and Multi-ops are not eligible. Certainly there's benefit in Multi-single for training, but I really see NAQP as a SO LP unassisted contest. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, Pete Smith N4ZR |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] to pre-amp or not to pre-amp, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, Pete Smith N4ZR |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, AE1P |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |