Herb
It is not about changing the op, in this case Eric is an acomplished Rf
engineer and contester, with a degree of antenna design
and lots of experience in terrain modeling.
So the perspective of an operator with that profile could shed significant
light on the overal station performance, since
certain QTH's have an advantage over others as well as other antennas also
bring that extra db, that can create an overrall better performance of the
station.
If we are going to stay true to our intention, our approach has to be
scientific and fair for KP4KE.. the information about his previous
operations is certainly valid and the committee
Im sure is considering it and has considered it, since I believe he has
already been DQ for power claims. Im sure there will be enought ways to
compare during the contest.
How much these records make sense can easily be easily analized by looking
at other zone 7 and 8 QRP stations in the past, but I think thats another
discussion...
Lets wait if his commitment stands, he has failed his commitments before..
Felipe
NP4Z
El sábado, 16 de mayo de 2015, Herbert Schoenbohm <
herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com> escribió:
> Felipe,
>
> I don't know how just changing the operator will prove anything at all.
> What I know to a moral certainty is the comparison on KP4TE alleged QRP
> signal on ground wave and that of NP4A's full power signal from a great
> location with a superb antenna system at the same time. This proved to me
> that KP4KE's claim of running "4.7 watts to a double bazooka" when he
> established his published record that his QRP" entry was totally bogus.
> The signal measurements made here of the two stations in comparison do not
> lie.
>
> Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
>
> On 5/16/2015 8:03 AM, Felipe J. Hernández wrote:
>
>> To address Herb's comments:
>>
>> We had an honest conversation with kp4ke regarding the questions around
>> his
>> qrp and other operations.
>> HE has agreed to allow ERic Np3a to operate his station and to show the
>> world how his station performs in qrp, the official date set by him was on
>> wpx cw this year.
>>
>> Certainly we are anxious as you to make sure that these were all valid
>> entries, let's wait for wpx and see.
>>
>> 73's
>>
>> Felipe
>> NP4Z
>>
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:52:26 -0400
>> From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle
>> Message-ID: <5553814A.9070103@vitelcom.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>
>> There are others in the record book essentially in perpetuity. The fact
>> that CQ Contesting still posts some of the biggest malefactors, i.e. the
>> low band QRP world records of an infamous station in KP4, just prevents
>> others from even giving such an impossible score a legitimate challenge.
>> These were certainty challenged and with the adequate proof of the fact
>> that the were the result of cheating. But since CQ let this matter just
>> slide and didn't properly DQ, it stands as a detriment to radio
>> contesting for those who follow the rules and as an encouragement to
>> those who don't .
>>
>> Looking ahead, either we slay this beast of contesting as we know it
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|