So how can one prove without any doubt that he did not cheat? The
evidence is pretty clear to me.
These decisions are not up for public debate or trials. The decisions
of the committee are final.
Mike W0MU
On 5/9/2015 5:08 PM, Stan Stockton wrote:
On 5/9/2015 12:11 PM, Lloyd Cabral wrote:
After following this thread, my only wish is that Randy would have
inquired here for another e-mail address
for Dim, or another source of contact with him BEFORE bringing this
issue mainstream. Accusations as
serious as this should first be handled privately with the accused
given a fair chance to defend himself.
Stan K5GO hit the nail on the head with his previous post. IMHO,
taking Dim's case public right off seemed
premature, unprofessional and totally unnecessary.
Lloyd KH6LC
On May 9, 2015, at 3:15 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com
<mailto:w0mu@w0mu.com>> wrote:
The guy got caught red handed and you people want to hang those that
caught him.
Mike,
I wish you had told everyone you had information showing or even
saying he got caught red handed a long time ago. Do you have some
information that says he was caught "red handed"?
Everyone else is reading what has been written and the email posted on
the reflector says that the committee had a "belief" that he was using
assistance and substantiated the fact that it was a "belief" by asking
him to provide a recording (not required in the rules) in order to
further evaluate the situation. However, even in that email, the
bottom line and last sentence, after what would appear to be an
attempt to communicate some hope that there would be further
evaluation, said emphatically and in no uncertain terms that he was
disqualified for 2014 but welcome to enter in 2015.
I am not making any assumption this process is as cut and dried as you
would like it to be.
73...Stan, K5GO
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|