CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchanges

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchanges
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:20:46 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I find six nine instead of sixty-nine much easier to accurately copy on SSB
and best of all it is less syllables. 

John KK9A

To:     cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject:        [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchanges
From:   <w2lc@twcny.rr.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:49:59 +0000
List-post:
<cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Why would someone change their check?

Well speaking for myself, sending a check of 69 was generating way too many 
calls for repeats on SSB. So sometime after I got my new call W2LC I changed
my 
check to 96, my "first year licensed" as W2LC. Better than 69 on SSB, still 
meets the rule, and less confusion on whether or not I said 59 or 69.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>