A friend of mine, no stranger to the top 10, made this comment to me in an
off line email.......
"....the enormous arrogance of the tiny minority that can afford to operate
from "the other side" and feel as thought the whole contest is only about
THEM. Apparently the rest of us are just cannon fodder, filler for their
logs."
I agree with him.
And, oh by the way Barry, yes, some of us still "search".
73, de Hans, K0HB
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Adams
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:15 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules
Did anyone tally the feedback made _after_ WPX about stations that felt they
were more/less disadvantaged because of the ID requirement, or stations that
that found the contest more/less fun because of the rule change?
To be honest, I don't remember much post-contest feedback one way or the
other; I just remember a lot of fuss when the change was announced.
While I think that a strong argument could be made that ID frequency is a
strategy choice that could be of concern between competitive stations in a
close race, I also think that a stronger argument could be made that having
running stations ID more frequently might enhance the enjoyment of little
guns or casual operators who fill the logs of the competitive stations.
Personally, I don't think that the proposed rule change is the end of the
world. But I'd play in the contest and have fun regardless of whether the
change was made. Others' mileage may vary.
--
Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org
W0MU wrote:
The aim is gain two way contacts? I thought it was to work as many
people as possible and as many mults. Pileup control is done by giving
callsigns.
So in an effort to placate the I NEED IT NOW society a rules change has
been
made to remove a viable strategy from a run station so that S&P stations
can
get a call or verify a call faster.
The next rule change we need is that everyone gets a shiny trophy and we
have
no winners and losers..................
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|