To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules |
From: | Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:25:04 +0200 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
AF6O wrote:>Once you try to force a competitor to adopt a strategy to boost his competitors score it ceases to be a contest. With the aim of the contest being to gain as much TWO-WAY-contacts, the other half of a qso seems to be such an essential part(ner) of the action that the decision does not seem to be unwise. Oh, and it is simply fair to take care of that point. But YMMV Chris DL8MBS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules, Radio K0HB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules, Radio K0HB |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |