CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...
From: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:18:17 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Fun and contesting....do those terms still mix?   :)

On 6/6/2013 12:26 PM, Gerry Hull wrote:
Agreed, Ed.  In the end, It doesn't matter one hill of beans..

I'll ask the FD chairman -- but I'm simply a band captain trying to figure
out what I want to do.
The club has been 4A for years -- they probably don't want to change now.

Until this rule this year, it would not have been a no-brainer decision.

So, we will either change categories or coordinate the number of on-air
TX's (as N4OGA suggested), or I'll just not configure it.

It's still going to be a lot of fun -- as it always is.

73, Gerry W1VE


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Edward Sawyer <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>wrote:

Gerry, Just call it a 5A and be done with it.  Then you can still
demonstrate and you are not trying to "intentionally claim fewer
transmitters".  After all.its not a contest.  What does it matter?



Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>