To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?... |
From: | "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net> |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:16:00 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Gerry, Just call it a 5A and be done with it. Then you can still demonstrate and you are not trying to "intentionally claim fewer transmitters". After all.its not a contest. What does it matter? Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?..., RT Clay |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?..., Gerry Hull |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WPX CW 2013 raw scores, Zivney, Terry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?..., Gerry Hull |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |