CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:54:02 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'd add just a note on spots ...   The real problem is people jumping on 
spots and all winding up on the same frequency, even if it is not 
zero-beat with the DX.  It rarely will be anyway, and a little judicious 
tweaking of the XIT control, or even (heaven forbid) tuning to center 
the DX in your pass-band while he signs, should bring you nicely out of 
the ruck without anyone having to send "up one" or whatever.  I'm sure 
Bob was talking about the up 5 splits, not something within 300 Hz or so.

73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at 
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000

On 8/27/2012 10:03 AM, Tom W8JI wrote:
> <<<<
> Bob probably meant to get across the concept that one  should not listen up
> 5 as expeditions do so. If the pileup is really  getting out of hand, then
> up 1 should be enough as long as those calling do not zero beat with each
> other. >>>>
>
> Up 5 takes no more room than up 1, or any split much wider than the
> bandwidth of filters.
>
> What really wastes space are splits that do not center people in one CW
> channel width, especially  where people do not listen to see if a frequency
> is already occupied.
>
> For example, calling up 4 or 4.5 while the station says up 5 will waste
> space and hog the band.  Calling within a hundred cycles or so of up 5 uses
> no more band space than calling within 100 cycles or so of up 1.
>
> I'd almost bet that the majority who try to call up some specific number
> will be off + - at least 100 Hz just by accident. One way to encourage that
> might be to operate a weird frequency, instead of exactly on a 500Hz or a
> multiple of 500 Hz.
>
> It would be interesting to see what the real statistics are.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>