CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW

To: Chris Tran GM3WOJ <gm3woj@christran.net>, CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW
From: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:15:22 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In my not so humble opinion, using two frequencies on the same band during a 
contest is inconsiderate at best.



On Aug 26, 2012, at 6:40 AM, "Chris Tran GM3WOJ" <gm3woj@christran.net> wrote:

> Hello all
> 
> In the CQ WW CW 2011 results, Bob K3EST says 'split operation in a major
> contest should not happen'.
> 
> I absolutely agree if the big Single-ops or Multi-ops decide to go split
> just to increase their rates, but for the small contest DXpedition with
> limited antennas and power, it means that it
> becomes *impossible* to work stations on certain bands - the pile-up cannot
> hear you properly and just calls continuously.
> 
>> From my experience of being a rare mult at GZ7V in 2010 and ZK2V last year,
> I could not work anything on 80m or 40m, 20m was tough, and only 15m and
> 10m were really useable - once the pile-up builds on e.g. 40m your rate
> drops to zero after only a few minutes. I went 'up 1' on 10m for a while
> which made life easier for everyone. Split was not viable on 40m or 20m.
> 
> If split operation is not allowed, it should say so in the rules ?
> 
> 73
> Chris
> GM3WOJ / ZL1CT
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>