CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend.....

To: "Shane Mattson-->K1ZR" <k1zr@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend.....
From: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:02:44 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sometimes I think the thing to do would be to work them and not even ask for
a callsign, just not log anything on my end. If enough of us did that and
sent in logs, they might get the idea (probably not). Now if I don't hear an
ID in 2-3 Qs I just move on. I have better things to do than wait and I
don't use the cluster even if it is allowed.

Jim K0XU

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Shane Mattson-->K1ZR <k1zr@comcast.net>wrote:

>
>
> Is it me or is the issue with DX signing their call sign once every 1-3
> minutes (sometimes more!) getting extremely frustrating?  The worst example
> was a station in the Africa region who decided to run split on
> 15M and informed callers of their callsign and RX frequency every 1-3
> minutes causing a pileup of callers on their TX frequency and a swath of
> stations sending 'Up', 'Up', 'Up'.  Seriously, not everyone relies on packet
> spots and it would be great if the DX could sign their call every 4-5 q's.
> This is where bogus spots on the cluster cause major problems as I'm sure
> that those who simply point and shoot to a spotted mult work 'em and move on
> before actually hearing the station's call.  Help!
>
>
>
> -Shane K1ZR
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>