CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
From: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:15:58 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
After I first sent this question k3est replied that he was traveling and
forwarded the request to "others"...  how about it "others"?  can we proceed
with using skimmers the way we have in other contests or are you going to
stick by this new weird distinction between the RBN and other sources of
skimmer spots?


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Robbins [mailto:k1ttt@verizon.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 13:20
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Cc: questions@cqww.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
> 
> 
> *C. *Remote skimmers (beyond the 500m station circle) are *not permitted
> for
> any category,* except for the *Reverse Beacon Network (RBN).* *Utilization
> of the RBN is permitted for all Multi-Operator classes as well as for the
> Single Operator-Assisted categories ONLY.* If you are a single op entry
> and
> access the Reverse Beacon Network, *you MUST submit your log as
> ASSISTED.***
> 
> 
> What makes the RBN unique that allows it but not direct access to other
> skimmer servers?  Should I block all access to my skimmer server, or
> monitor who is connected to report them to the committee???  I think there
> is at least one other skimmer aggregator at ve7cc, is that one not allowed
> but RBN is?



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>