Hi David,
Now it hurts? What do you say if look at SSB scores, multiply each QSO 3pts,
equally for all and take a look. 4O3A should be WW winner, and scores weight
looks much more reasonable.
Why not..Make each continent more competitive..
73
Ranko
________________
Non-USA SOAB HP
HC8A(N6KT) 8036 166 519 47 16,012,560 NCCC ( 16M513 )
CN2R(W7EJ) 6255 167 608 45 14,370,050 ( 14M542 )
8P5A(W2SC) 8037 147 501 47.5 12,667,752 NCCC ( 15M623 )
CR2X(OH2UA) 8179 143 523 48 11,067,588 CCF ( 16M057 )
4O3A(ES5TV) 7680 165 581 48 10,682,720 SKY CC ( 17M187 )
KH7XS(K4XS) 6156 142 318 45 8,302,900 FCG ( 8M495 )
Subject: [Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
> What's wrong with this picture?
>
> EF8M(RD3AF) 7374 131 409 48 11,888,100
> V47NT(N2NT) 7402 135 457 48 11,231,424
>
> Let's see, V47NT has more Q's more zones and significantly more
> countries, but a lower score!
>
> So basically, he out-performed EF8M in all aspects and still loses.
>
> I think it's time for an evaluation of the scoring rules.
>
> What do you think?
>
> David ~ KY1V
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|