CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] License

To: Yuri VE3DZ <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] License
From: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:18:03 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yuri VE3DZ wrote:

>Well, then how, for instance, about a bunch of Europeans answering 
>split-CQ's of the U.S. stations below 7040?
>A lot of them are not allowed to run SSB below that frequency.
>Should the CQ WW committee DQ them if someone raises complaint?
>
>Just curious, how far should that go.
>  
>
IMHO just like in real sports. They have sets of different penaties 
other than only the ultimate weapon DQ. Different percentages of points 
deduction may allow for sanctioning "fouls" like this (allowing to treat 
single calls on a wrong VFO different to hours of SSB-CQ on 7010). DQ 
would be too hard, but leaving it without sanction will establish such 
practises even more. Sports live quite comfortable with freekicks, 
offtime-penalties, yellow and red cards.
YMMV
73, Chris



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>