CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] License

To: "'Yuri VE3DZ'" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] License
From: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:26:49 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi,
Should this really come as a surprise? The rules do state that you agree
that you have operated in accordance with the rules of the licensing
authority that has jurisdiction, which in this case is Colombia.

If it's true that RA3CQ was not licensed, his operation failed to satisfy
CQ's rules.

Does it mean you need to submit proof of licensing? No. But it does mean
that you should be prepared to submit such proof.

73 kelly
Ve4xt


-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Yuri VE3DZ
Sent: June-04-09 1:04 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] License

I just read this article:
http://www.radio-sport.net/hk_ra3co2.htm
Is this official? I mean the DQ...
Does it mean that every station operating from a DX location (especially
guest ops) and making it into the top ten will now need to submit a proof of
licensing to the CQ WW Contest committee?

Yuri  VE3DZ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>