I am under the impression that the folks at eQSL made some software
changes to accomodate working with CQ. Now that this problem of
mobiles operating from multiple counties has been identified, perhaps
it can be brought to the attention of the folks at eQSO to see if they
can come up with a way to make everyone happy...
Tom - VE3CX
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C
<jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Cool Ted!
>>
>> It will be fun to see who completes ALL of the counties on eQSL first, now
>> small feat I'm sure!
>
> >From what I can tell, the CHers (mobile operators) aren't too keen on
> it. Yes, they would love to avoid having to exchange paper
> confirmations. However, they will have to create an eQSL profile for
> *each* county they operate from. This is no small feat for people
> like N4CD, who typically will put out all 250+ Texas counties in a
> given calendar year.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|