CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:25:45 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Now *that's* over the top!  Slavery?  Give me a break!

I think I read the same public commentary as you did, David, and I thought 
it was almost uniformly opposed to your position.  Since any controversial 
topic on this reflector tends to draw the vociferous on both sides, that 
suggests to me that the balance of contester opinion is not on your side.

I'm not suggesting that you did anything wrong, just that you *are* wrong 
on this one.

73, Pete N4ZR



At 02:54 PM 2/10/2009, David Kopacz wrote:
>I suggest it is more likely:
>
>89% didn't take the poll
>6% favor open logs
>3% don't care
>2% opposed
>
>Even if the poll on contesting.com were an accurate representation of
>the contesting population, one must keep in mind that just because
>something is popular, doesn't make it right (slavery comes to mind here)
>
>The results are likely similar to the response I received after
>announcing withholding my logs from CQ Magazine.
>
>Publicly, a few squeaky wheels shouted loudly against my action, while
>privately via email, more than twice as many applauded my decision to
>take a stand.
>
>I'll be more than happy to release my logs for inspection to the
>paranoid, the accusers, the naysayers and those that simply think there
>must be "more to the story", once the results are published.
>
>Mission accomplished.
>
>David ~ KY1V
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of VE5ZX
>Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 9:32 AM
>To: 'CQ-Contest com'
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Driving at 4AM
>
> > Likewise, I continue on philosophical and political grounds to oppose
>the
> > concept of "open logs" as is currently being debated.  That doesn't
>mean I
>
>The current survey on contesting.com suggests opposition to open logs
>for
>any reason maybe a minority opinion.
>
>61% favor open logs, 24% don't care and 8% are opposed.
>
>
>... Sylvan
>
>Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX
>Saskatoon, SK
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>