CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?

To: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:13:41 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Enforceability is irrelevant.  We already have all kinds of rules that 
are impossible to enforce.  It's impossible to detect if a single op is 
getting help with mults from a second ham in the shack.  It's impossible 
to detect if someone is running excess power.  It's impossible to detect 
if someone is scanning the band to make of list of callsigns and 
frequencies during a mandatory off period.  It's impossible to detect if 
someone is checking the DX Summit history after the contest to correct 
their logs for callsign accuracy.  I'm sure I could list a few more.

Rules set boundary conditions for honest players ... rules don't stop 
the cheats.

Dave   AB7E



Mike Fatchett W0MU wrote:
>
> Why create rules that are nearly impossible to enforce or prove? 
>
>   
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>