Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SN...has to be a better way!

["Doug Grant" <dougk1dg@gmail.com>]

KR2Q wrote:

> Comments?

Anything too "new" will confuse the casual participants. Stick with
the conventional "NR?", "NR AGN?", or "NR 112 OK?" to ask for a fill,
and a hand-sent, more-space-between-the-numbers repeat without uncut
numbers...maybe a bit slower also.

> And please don't tell me to just run more than 5 watts.  :-)

OK...put up bigger antennas, then. You're welcome.

73,

Doug K1DG
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest