To: | cq-contesting <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] OH NO! New Technology!!! |
From: | Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu> |
Date: | Tue, 27 May 2008 09:24:52 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On May 25, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Dick-w0raa wrote: > Here we go, months and months of pro & con debate over HTML vs > Text. I > guess the good thing is that it will get rid of all the Skimmer > crap. At > least for a while. :) > Does use of the rate sheet put an Op in the assisted category? Jes kiddin' More seriously, HTML is an awkward format for messages that might be printed. I had recommended PDF because it will print out - and be seen on screen-exactly the way the originator means it to. -73 de Mike N3LI - _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] OH NO! New Technology!!!, Michael Coslo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977again, Alfred Frugoli |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] OH NO! New Technology!!! - Advertisements, Lee Buller |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] OH NO! New Technology!!!, K0HB |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |