CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: aleith@syd.eastlink.ca, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:02:34 EDT
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In a message dated 3/30/2008 8:33:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
aleith@syd.eastlink.ca writes:

Perhaps,  then, casual contesters (I being one) should start to foul the
system by  giving honest reports.  I certainly will do this in every contest
I  play around in, in the future.


Inspired by this thread, I did exactly that for the 90 qsos I made in the  
couple of hours I was on in the WPX. I sent a uniform, non-59  report.
 
I was only calling guys, most of whom had fairly strong signals. I was  
running the amplifier, so I doubt that I was very weak.
 
A very few big guns stopped to note the non-59, but most people were either  
very good at logging non-59 reports in tempo, or never noticed the  
difference.  I suspect the later. I did not emphasize the report, but  neither 
did I 
mumble it, I think.
 
One friend did give me a 51 +30 report.  Not sure how that  works.
 
Now to remember to get out the text editor before I send in my log.
 
Do these reports get checked in the log checking process?
 
 
73  -  Jim   K8MR
 
 



**************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL 
Home.      
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15&ncid=aolhom00030000000001)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>