To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges |
From: | Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com> |
Reply-to: | Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com> |
Date: | Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:28:05 -0400 (GMT-04:00) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
K8DD wrote: >When you work them, if they don't give you an RST, ask them for it. This is exactly what I did when I worked 4O3A Saturday. And for those who will quibble about whether "59(9)" should be replaced with something more "meaningful" - this topic isn't about that so please don't hijack the thread. The rule, as N2IC noted, is the rule. > "V. Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact three-digit serial > number starting with 001 for the first contact." 73, Mike K9NW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, Alan Leith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, Paul O'Kane |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, John Geiger |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, Alan Leith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |