CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation]

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation]
From: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 09 Sep 2006 23:20:23 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 15:00, Kelly Taylor wrote:
> Don't you see: the regional disparity you use to discredit my argument is 
> EXACTLY WHY I don't see value in Ev's idea.

Can't we have it *both* ways?

I suggest we continue to consider categories the way we do now for
issuance of awards, and within the official contest rules.

On the contest website, we collect and display additional information.  

So, to get wallpaper, you have to have one of the top-10 scores under
the existing rules.  But if you want to know if you were the
highest-scoring station with less than 300 watts and operating west of
Yonge St., then you can get on arrl.org & find out.  
-- 
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN  EM66
http://www.w9wi.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>