To: | CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation] |
From: | Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:26:10 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
--- "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com> wrote: > Operators that are inclined to cheat today would > still lie about the conditions under which they > attained their scores. Any other conclusion would be naive, of course. The difference is that greater public scrutiny can be had by revealing greater amounts of information. This is a basic tennant of peer-pressure and "self policing". Ev, W2EV __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation], Kelly Taylor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation], Robert Naumann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation], Jack Brindle |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A New Perspective [was:WRTC Spot/Log Correlation], Robert Naumann |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |