CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules

To: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:52:01 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> always be 57 because that is the Check of N7MAL, the station licensee. Our
> FCC rules regarding this subject are not ambiguous even though, especially
> during contests, they are frequently violated. ARRL contest rules do not
> supercede FCC rules.
> Best 73

Actually they are, Mal. Since we are no longer required to sign /m
or /p for mobile or portable, I can go anywhere in the CONUS and
legally call CQ signing my callsign, W4EF. Now if that particular
location happens to be the address of record for someone else
(say N7MAL), am I a guest operator at "N7MAL" or am I "W4EF/p"?
Show me what paragraph of part 97 clearly stipulates that one.

73 de Mike, W4EF..............

>
> MAL               N7MAL
> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kelly Taylor
> To: N7MAL
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules
>
>
> This rule is hardly without ambiguity. It doesn't specify if the person it
> is speaking to is the guy in the chair or the guy who owns the station.
It's
> further confused by the fact that there's no requirement to use the
owner's
> callsign (hence the @call listings). That it's ambiguous doesn't mean the
> door is wide open, as N1ND's note says. But it does mean we can't be
> surprised if checks change.
>
> My gut on this says that if this is the most important complaint about SS,
> people are working way too hard to find things to complain about.
>
> Our responsibility is to interpret and log what was sent. It's not our
> responsibility to sweat over whether it's what was sent last year. That it
> may change is a good thing. Keeps us on our toes.
>
> 73, kelly
> ve4xt
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 12:23 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules
>
>
> Sweepstakes rule:
> 4.4. Check (the last two digits of the year you were first licensed);
>
> I worked a station, during ss phone, who I have known for many years. The
> station is an above average station and frequently has guest ops and even
> multi efforts. When the op sent the check it was 30+ years off. I didn't
> challenge it because they were doing a serious, very serious, effort and I
> was just giving out points.
>
> My question is: Are the rules really rules or just guidelines we can all
> bend and twist to suit our individual purposes?
>
>
>
> MAL               N7MAL
> BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>