>> I would like to see contest reporting with HOW MANY HOURS (such as in
>> SS) reported. How about you?
>
>I like the Sweepstakes (and whatever other contest) listings that list
>the hours of operation. I'd like to see this for all contests, though I
>suspect that many would consider it a waste of space in the magazines
>for contests as short as the NAQP.
>
Add me to the 'yes' column. I virtually never go the full time period on
any contest, but I still want some "credit" for my effort in terms of
Qs/hour at least. Maybe we can have a full discussion on a "casual" entry
classification :-)
(I'm already ducking the rotten eggs)
--Jim, K6ZH
>From David O. Hachadorian" <0006471356@mcimail.com Mon Jan 10 20:37:00 1994
From: David O. Hachadorian" <0006471356@mcimail.com (David O. Hachadorian)
Subject: K6LL naqp score & comments
Message-ID: <21940110203712/0006471356PK2EM@mcimail.com>
naqp cw 1-94, K6LL score:
band QSOs mults
____________________________
160 21 12
80 122 43
40 170 47
20 171 49
15 147 50
10 114 42
____________________________
total: 745 243 claimed score: 181,035
Comments:
1. To me, this contest is more FUN than any other.
2. Should have allowed more time for 160. Low band condx were good.
3. What is the power limit for this contest, anyway? QST says 150w
output. NCJ says 100w output. Peak or average on ssb? Can we
resolve this issue before next weekend? I vote for 100w peak
output.
Dave
K6LL
k6ll@mci.com (note change of e-mail address)
|