WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] QSO Sequence over the network.

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] QSO Sequence over the network.
From: martyt@pobox.com (Marty Tippin)
Date: Wed Apr 23 23:08:09 2003
This subject has been covered a zillion times on the reflector.

Serial number sequence DOES NOT MATTER.
Duplicate serial numbers DO NOT MATTER.

NONE of the contest judges will penalize you in any way if you don't send 
exactly sequential numbers.

Just send the number WriteLog tells you to and you'll be fine.

-Marty NW0L
  martyt@pobox.com

At 11:01 PM 4/23/2003 -0300, Marcelo wrote:
>The rules now for WPX allow for independent serial numbers per band/ station.
>
>So you just go on SETUP // "Sort ordering and serial numbers" and check 
>the "Separate by band" option.
>
>73?s
>
>Marcelo
>PY1KN
>
>
>At 20:57 23/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>I am interested in an answer to this question, but have not seen a 
>>reply.  Anyone know what is going on with this question?
>>
>>Lee - K0WA
>>
>>
>>At 04:36 PM 4/22/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>>>Hi Gang,
>>>I have been putting together a small station comprising of a two radios 
>>>and two computers networked. All is OK with the network, however, how do 
>>>you stop both stations using the same QSO sequence number?.
>>>
>>>If say the Op on station 1 enters KP4xx the Sequence number appears to 
>>>the left of the KP4xx, but, if the Op on station 2 enters a callsign in 
>>>the call field before KP4xx is logged on station 1 then he gets the same 
>>>sequence number.
>>>
>>>With my daughter logging Qs in the next room at the same time as me, the 
>>>log looks real messy:
>>>
>>>Seq: 1, 2, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 8, 9, 10 ,10, 11, 13, etc...
>>>
>>>It works ok for an SO2R setup where I will only log one QSO at a time, 
>>>but what do you M/M or M/S op's do?
>>>
>>>I guess I am seriously doing something wrong.
>>>
>>>73 Darren G0TSM


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>