I made this request of Wayne about 3 years ago. And, recall someone else
making it in the past six or so months. But, I belive this is low on the
priority list. Low because it does not impact all WriteLog users, just
those of us with Icom Radios. PDAs Logic logging program also supports
multiple radios on a single CI-V controller so it definitely can be done.
Now to get the 756 repaired so I can get back to playing around with the
two radio thing!
W0ETC
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 22:24:58 -0000 "W1NET" <W1NET@arrl.net> writes:
> For the other questions answered thank-you folks.
>
> I was the one who mentioned yplog. This is very very very
> disappointing. I
> don't need the network stuff but the two radios is what I really
> wanted. I
> wish there was a term that venders would use when it comes to ICOM
> radios.
> Such as : Support ICOM serial but not CI-V. I guess it must be a
> real bear
> to program. I should have specifically asked this question before I
> bought
> it. My mistake. Coughing up more money is not going to happen. (Do
> you
> know what these things cost? Crazy price and no I don't want some 3d
> party
> fix...heck one day when the interface changes that thing may not
> work!
> Besides the multi radio support is the reason that silly CI-V is so
> expensive.)
>
> I guess I just hope its on some long term wish list.
>
> TXS,
>
> John W1NET
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave N4IG" <n4ig@tampabay.rr.com>
> To: "Jim Brannigan" <jbrannig@optonline.net>;
> <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 5:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] ICOM
>
>
> > Hi Jim et all.
> >
> > I have the ICOM manuals from a 707 and
> > a 746 Pro and while it isn't clear the
> > master slave condition seems to
> > be controlled with the rig/CT17 Transceive
> > function. It appears that when the function
> > is turned off the rigs act independent of each
> > other and can be controlled by the computer
> > if the program allows multiple rigs to be attached
> > to a COMM port via a CT17. N8BJQ points out
> > that only YPLog seems to support this connection.
> >
> > This discussion has been quite enlightening to me
> > and as always the reflector is a great source of
> > knowledge.
> >
> > 73 Dave N4IG
> > _______________________________________________
> > WriteLog mailing list
> > WriteLog@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
>
|