VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Serious and non-serious categories in VHF contesting

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Serious and non-serious categories in VHF contesting
From: JamesDuffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:45:16 -0600
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
I am not sure what point you are trying to make, but there are no new 
categories. And, again, I am not sure how you are trying to categorize the 
current contestants, but casual is probably a better categorization than 
non-serious. 

Amateur radio contesting is a unique sociological competitive interaction. 
Unlike most contests, the scores of the top (serious, if you will) competitors, 
depends on the scores of everyone else (including the casual) in the 
competition, making QSOs. And the scores of the casual competitors depend on 
the scores of the top contesters. The scores of everyone in the contest depends 
on the scores of everyone else in the contest. The competitive stations do 
their best when the casual operators make more QSOs. Currently the concern is 
that the casual contestants are primarily on digital modes; while there are 
more of them, they are not making as many QSOs as they could, which impacts the 
competitive contester. There are no other competitions that I know of where the 
top scorers are dependent on how well everyone else does. That is one of issues 
with the casual operators using the digital modes exclusively. - Duffey KK6MC


James Duffey KK6MC
Cedar Crest NM

> On Mar 22, 2021, at 10:00, vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com wrote:
> 
> Is there a new catagory for serious contesting and non-serious contesting?  I 
> must have missed it.
> 
> Steve, N4JQQ, EM55

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>