To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [PNWVHFS] FT8 frequencies for 2m and 70cm --tentative decision |
From: | Steve Kavanagh via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Steve Kavanagh <sjkavanagh1@yahoo.ca> |
Date: | Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:02:09 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Hi Pete I am not sure 144.174 for FT8 would work very well in the east. Outside of contests it would likely be fine but during contests, SSB/CW activity almost always extends down to .170 (top multi-op W2SZ/1 is always there!) and sometimes to .165. I wondered about 144.313, but I see ARRL lists this as an OSCAR subband, which seems odd since it seems to be incompatible with the Region 1 band plan (https://iaru-r1.org/index.php/spectrum-and-band-plans/vhf/2-meter). I think 144.313 would be ok with respect to the (rather antiquated) Canadian band plan (http://wp.rac.ca/144-mhz-2m-page/ ). 73, Steve VE3SMA _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwd: [PNWVHFS] FT8 frequencies for 2m and 70cm --tentative decision, Scott Armstrong |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [PNWVHFS] FT8 frequencies for 2m and 70cm --tentative decision, James Worsham |
Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] Fwd: [PNWVHFS] FT8 frequencies for 2m and 70cm --tentative decision, N6Ze via VHFcontesting |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] [PNWVHFS] FT8 frequencies for 2m and 70cm --tentative decision, James Worsham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |