VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] Digital Questions

To: "VHF Contesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>, "Marshall-K5QE" <k5qe@k5qe.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Digital Questions
From: "Steve \(K1IIG\)" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>
Reply-to: "Steve \(K1IIG\)" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:51:27 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Marshall,
Thank you for a very informative article detailing the different digital mode 
pros and cons. I have not ventured into this and not sure I will as most of my 
operating is on the upper UHF bands. I see a lot of confusion with the various 
setups including major QRM packet collisions with only one calling frequency. 
Three questions come to mind.
1.    If the digital modes continue to get popular, do you think having a 
separate Digital Contest makes sense?
2.    If not, should the rules be re-written to equalize the playing field. 
3.    If the automated computer program completes the contact and not the ham 
operator, does this truly constitute a ham op making the contact or his station 
making it. I wish to compete against other hams not just their station 
computers. Hams copying vs computer decoding.

I do enjoy using a PC to assist making a contact with a SDR e/w a panadapter 
waterfall but in the end I have to copy the weak signal to complete a legit 
contact. 

73's and Tnx for posting the article
Steve K1IIG
HF-3.4+10ghz


https://www.dropbox.com/s/9l5oeiir4inn4x6/Contesting%20and%20Digital%20Modes.doc?dl=0
 

73 Marshall K5QE
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>