VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?

To: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>, "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?
From: Paul Kiesel via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 22:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
This is a good suggestion. I've used RG-174 to build attenuators for a long 
time (I found a reel of it at a local surplus store). RG-174 is small and easy 
to work with. It will handle a hundred watts past 1,000 MHz. Check out the 
specs here:

http://www.belden.com/techdatas/metric/8216.pdf

73, Paul K7CW
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 2/4/17, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich <mike@ka5cvh.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control?
 To: "N1BUG" <paul@n1bug.com>
 Cc: "VHFcontesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>, newsvhf@mailman.qth.net
 Date: Saturday, February 4, 2017, 1:57 PM
 
 On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at
 1:04 PM, N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
 wrote:
 
 > High power
 attenuators are expensive and I don't like to be
 generating 100W
 > on the IF frequency.
 
 MAU wrote
 
 I've never done this myself but I've
 heard of people using a run of
 high LOSS
 feedline between the two to act as an attenuater.
 
 -- 
 Mike Urich
 KA5CVH
 http://ka5cvh.com
 PIO
 Harris County ARES
 STX: (A)PIC Dist 1 &
 14
 
 100 watts and a wire.
 
 "If serving is below
 you
 Leadership is beyond you"
 _______________________________________________
 VHFcontesting mailing list
 VHFcontesting@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>