To: | vhfcontesting@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Height vs. foliage |
From: | Patrick Thomas <p-thomas@mindspring.com> |
Reply-to: | Patrick Thomas <p-thomas@mindspring.com> |
Date: | Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:23:20 -0400 (EDT) |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
Although 6m is a great band, my primary interest is in 2m & 440, and really I would like to get more active on 220, 33cm (yes really), and 23cm. I only mention this because the line-of-sight, tree penetration characteristics, and amplifier cost at 6m are very different from those at 70cm or 23cm. But thanks for all the ideas. :) _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Height vs. foliage, Peter Laws |
---|---|
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Height vs. foliage, Peter Laws |
Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] OFF TOPIC, Herb Krumich via VHFcontesting |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |