To: | Tim Marek <k7xc_tx@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] 12 foot rover mast too high? |
From: | "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:22:23 -0600 |
List-post: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Tim Marek via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> wrote: > The Highway Patrol in several states have told me that 16 feet was the l Mike wrote This is the law. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/geometric/pubs/mitigationstrategies/chapter3/3_verticalclearance.cfm -- Mike Urich KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com If a "flat tithe" is good enough for God; then a "flat tax" should be good enough for Washington. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Rover Mast height, Rick R |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Mast height, an experiance in Los Angeles...., Tim Marek via VHFcontesting |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] 12 foot rover mast too high?, Tim Marek via VHFcontesting |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] 12 foot rover mast too high?, Mike Metroka via VHFcontesting |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |