On 9/23/2013 9:52 AM, Zack Widup wrote:
It's not harder than running QRP on 160. :-)
73, Zack W9SZ
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jack W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2013 4:02 PM, George Fremin III wrote:
VHF is not harder than HF.
Actually, George, for a "little pistol" in rural Nevada, VHF *is* harder.
Being a NV mult was generally worth 10db and, with 100 watts, we could, on
occasion, hold a run frequency in HF contests. A comparable setup on VHF
doesn't guarantee you can even *be heard* much less work anyone.
73,
--
Jack, W6NF/VE4
Shelley, K7MKL/VE4
______________________________**_________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
Actually, running QRP on Top-Band requires a special sort of masochism.
We won't go there. :>)
--
Jack, W6NF/VE4
Shelley, K7MKL/VE4
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|