VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Announcing the VHF Distance Scoring 2009 Repor

To: Stanford VHF email Remailer <VHF@w6yx.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Announcing the VHF Distance Scoring 2009 Report
From: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Terry,
The work that Kevin spearheaded as part of the "VHF Distance Scoring" Yahoo 
group is designed to provide information and a sample framework for sponsors to 
analyze as they design their OWN DX-point scored events.

It contains recommendations based on a combination of log analysis and on-list 
commentary.

There is *nothing* binding about any of the statements in the study, however 
sponsors (and potential sponsors) would do well to carefully analyze the 
information contained therein to assure that the caveats that Kevin and the 
group uncovered are addressed in the events that they wish to sponsor.

One example of a DX-score based event that is not in full alignment with the 
initial recommendations is the recently announced WSJT contest.  Unless I've 
understood something incorrectly, they seem to weight all band-QSO's the same, 
yet provide a block of bonus-points for higher band QSO's.  Additionally, they 
chose a mile-based (rather than kilometer-based) scoring system and cited their 
own mile-based calculation schema as the authority for calculating DX.  Bravo!  
It is *their* contest. :)

*None* of that is bad, it simply illustrates the "opening" of VHF contesting to 
a more diverse set of rules.

Ev, W2EV



      
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>